Mekala v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.04.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P (MD).No.7432 of 2022 Mekala ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (ALGSC), Dindigul District.

...Respondent

Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to take action on the petitioner's representation, dated 28.03.2022 in accordance with law within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to directing the respondents to take action on the petitioner's representation, dated 28.03.2022.

2. It is seen that the petitioner has lodged complaints before the respondent police on 28.03.2022 and the same is still pending without any progress.

3. In view of the same, the second respondent police is directed to conduct enquiry, on the complaint lodged by the petitioner after issuing notice to the petitioner and dispose of the same, within a peirod of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) btr To

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH (ALGSC), DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

W.P (MD).No.7432 of 2022 20.04.2022 SP/11/05/2022/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/