← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8928/2017dismissed

Esakkithevar v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-07-26Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR CRL.O.P.(MD)No.8928 of 2017 and CRL.MP(MD)No.6030 & 6031 of 2017 1.Esakkithevar 2.Esakkimuthu @ Durai 3.Ganapathy Thevar 4.Suriya @ Pitchai 5.Pattunathan 6.Ramganesh 7.Paraman 8.Kannaiah 9.Sundar 10.Manikandan : Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 10 -Vs1.The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.150 of 2017) : Respondent/Complainant 2.B.Ayyappan Inspector of Police, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District.

: Respondent/De-facto Complainant 3.The Sub Divisional Magistrate/ Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.

: Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to Call for the Records impugned proceedings vide Na.KA.NO.A2/C.C/11/2017 dated 07.06.2017 on the file of the Learned Sub Divisional Magistrate /Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District having been initiated u/s. 107 of Cr.P.C in pursuance of the FIR dated 30.05.2017 bearing cr NO. 150/2017 on the file of the Inspector of police Alangulam Police Station Tirunelveli dist and subsequently quash the same as illegal erroneous and devoid of merits.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) ***

O R D E R

This petition is filed against the initiation of a proceeding under Section 107 r/w 111 of Cr.P.C. by the 3rd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.A2/C.C./11/2017, dated 07.06.2017 pursuant to the First Information Report dated 30.05.2017 in Crime No.150 of 2017 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2.The impugned proceeding is nothing but a show cause notice issued under Section 107 r/w 111 of Cr.P.C. The show cause notice only indicate that a few members of a community are given this show cause notice as to why they should not be directed to execute security bond under Section 107 r/w 111 of Cr.P.C. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not involved in any criminal case as no criminal case is registered against any one of them. The provision under Section 107 Cr.P.C are meant to preserve the public peace and communal harmony. The enquiry is for the purpose of preventing breach of peace. In this case, on the basis of the report of the police, the proceedings were initiated under Section 107 of Cr.P.C. The petitioners are referred to as "A" Party.

Since the problem or quarrel is between two communities, it is required in the interest of public to name the prominent persons in the village representing the community so as to prevent public peace. Hence, there is no substance in the argument of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Further, the impugned proceeding is only a show cause notice. The ingredients for invoking Section 107 and Section 111 are evident. Unless it is shown that the authority who issued has no jurisdiction, this Court cannot interfere with the notice at this stage. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Sub Divisional Magistrate/ Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.S.PALANI VELAYUTHAM Advocate in SR. NO.68572 SRM/LS JS/MR.KKR/SAR.4/7.8.2017/3P-6C CRL.O.P.(MD)No.8928 of 2017 26.07.2017