Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13342/2015disposed of

The Ponnamaravathi v. The Inspector General Of

2015-07-29Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.07.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition (MD) No.13342 of 2015 The Ponnamaravathi, Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Pudukottai District rep by its Executive Officer, M.S.Ganesan ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai.

2.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Karaikudi Registration District, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.The Sub Registrar, Ponnamaravathy, Pudukottai District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to complete the enquiry in view of circular 67 dated 03.11.2011 in respect of alleged sale deed No.2820 of 2011 based on the representation of the petitioner's dated 02.06.2015 and pass necessary orders thereon in accordance with law within the time frame.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Janarthanam, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.R.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. By consent, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.

2.The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the second respondent to complete the enquiry in view of circular 67 dated 03.11.2011 in respect of the alleged sale deed No.2820 of 2011 based on the representation of the petitioner's dated 02.06.2015 3.According to the petitioner, one Lakshmanan Chettiyar has executed a power deed in favour of one R.M.Subramanian Chettiyar entrusting right to manage the mutt affairs. While so, he has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

executed a sale deed in favour of one V.Ravikumar in respect of S.Nos.841/5, 841/6, 841/7, 841/8, 841/13, 842/2, 846/1 and 846/2 which are belonging to the Government and maintained by the Town Panchayat. Therefore, as per circular 67 issued by the first respondent, the alleged sale deed in Document No.2820/2011 has to be set aside after holding a detailed enquiry. Hence, the petitioner made a representation on 02.06.2015 to the respondent for the above said purpose. Since no final order has been passed, the present writ petition has been filed for the aforementioned relief. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2015 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with the Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011 issued by the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Per.Admin) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar sms To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai.

2.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Karaikudi Registration District, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.The Sub Registrar, Ponnamaravathy, Pudukottai District. +one cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.43187. Writ Petition (MD) No.13342 of 2015 29.07.2015 CSL 17/08/2015 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/