Abusa Beebi, v. The Commissioner
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.14389 of 2014 Abusa Beebi ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Commissioner, City Corporation, Trichy.
2.Dr.R.Amuthavalli ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent not to issue any plan approval and building permit in favour of the second respondent in respect of Door No.78, Marsingpet Road, Beema Nagar and to monitor the newly proposed building if there is any violation of the Building Rules of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Building Rules, 1972, particularly the Rule 11(4) based on the petitioner's representation on 26.08.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohan For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah Government Advocate ******
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent not to issue any plan approval and building permit in favour of the second respondent in respect of Door No.78, Marsingpet Road, Beema Nagar and to monitor the newly proposed building if there is any violation of the Building Rules of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Building Rules, 1972, particularly the Rule 11(4) based on the petitioner's representation on 26.08.2014.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To +1cc to M/S.Special Government Pleader,SR. 65276 W.P(MD)No.14389 of 2014 12.07.2017 RM/AR KK/MR KKR/SAR1/21.07.2017/2P-2C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/