Ramamoorthy v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.04.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
1. Ramamoorthy
2. Kaliraj
3. Vairakutti
4. Manoj Munispandiyan
5. Mareeswaran
6. Kavisanthi Marishwaran
7. Indrani Erulappan
8. Mariyammal Madasamy
9. Mariyammal Gurusamy
10. Vijayalakshmi Muthuraj
11. Muthumari Shankar
12. Madasamy Krishnan
13. Solaisamy Lakshmanan
14. Chinna Madasamy 1/7
15. Muthuirulappan
16. Mariyammal Ponnusamy
17. Bhuvaneshwari Ponnusamy
18. Jayarani Chinnamadasamy
19. Chinnamadasamy Kannandy
20. D.Kandiyarammal
21. Chinnakani Mariyappan
22. Umamaheswari
23. Subburaj Ramasamy
24. Muneeswari Subburaj
25. Karpasamy
26. Manimalan
27. Vasanthakumar
28. Sathishkumar Chinnamadasamy
29. Arunagiri Mariyappan
30. Madhavan
31. Sangilimadasamy Iyyarnar
32. Mathavan Sethilkuamar
33. Duraimurugan 2/7
34. Thenarasu Mahendran
35. Asokkumar Madasamy
36. Ravi
37. Sriramagopal Subbaraj
38. Abipraba Ponnusamy
39. Rakkamal Chinnasamy
40. Madhinila Veerapandi
41. Sarmila Muthiya
42. Sivananthan Mariyapan
43. Santhanam ... Petitioners Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Vembakottai Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
Crime No. 5/2022.
2. Rajamuniasamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in FIR in Crime No. 5 of 2022 on the file of the 1st respondent police dt. 07.01.2022 and quash the same and to pass such further orders or other suitable orders. 3/7
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji, For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.T.Logaiasami
O R D E R
This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No. 5 of 2022 dated 07.01.2022 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 448, 380, 109 and 506(2) of IPC and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act and quash the same.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsels on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.
3. The defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and this Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto-complainant 4/7
represented that they entered into a compromise and he has no objection to quash the FIR. A compromise memo, dated 20.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsel, is also filed before this Court.
4. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.
5. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.
6. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No. 5 of 2022 dated 07.01.2022 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed as against these petitioners alone.
08.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 5/7
To
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Vembakottai Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
6/7
P. DHANABAL, J.
LR 08.04.2025 7/7