Syed Kattuva v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.932 of 2017 Syed Kattuva ... Petitioner/sole accused -Vs1. The State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Appanaickkanpatty Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

(Crime No.57 of 2016) ..Respondent/Complainant

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. ...Respondent/Investigating Officer

3. Palpandi ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in connection with the impugned final report in P.R.C.No.8 of 2016 on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sattur and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr. P. Amarnath For R-1 & R-2 : Mr. K. Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R-3 : Mr.K.Sankar

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the final report in P.R.C.No.8 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sattur.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner and the third respondent are present along with their counsel and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent police.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the third respondent would submit that the matter is now compromised out of the court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Further, both parties filed a joint compromise memo, dated 20.01.2017 stating that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the third respondent is not willing to proceed with the case in P.R.C.No.8 of 2016.

5. Hence, in view of affidavit and memo dated 20.01.207, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in P.R.C.No.8 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sattur, is hereby quashed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sattur.

2.-do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Appanaickkanpatty Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/s.G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate in SR. No.5033 PM JS/JM/14.02.2017/2P-7C Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 932 of 2017 31.01.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/