Jesu Puthiran v. K. Tamil

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirteenth day of June Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL MP(MD) No.3980 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.7976 of 2018 JESU PUTHIRAN ... PETITIONER/3rd PARTY/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT Vs 1 K.TAMIL 2 I.SILVESTER 3 E.LAWRENCE 4 L.GUDWIN 5 L.GODWIN 6 S.SKUBIN 7 A.GOLDWIN 8 J.PRAVEEN @ SAHAYA PRAVIN 9 S.JOSEPH 10 J.PUTHTHIMAAN @ GEORGE 11 S.RAYAPPAN 12 J.ABISHEK 13 M.ANANTH @ ANANTH RAJ 14 A.ALBIN @ ALBIN VINOTH 15 J.KARADI(SEBASTHIYAN) @ ANTHONY PRASATH ... RESPONDENTS 1-15/PETITIONERS 1-15 ACCUSED 1-15 16.THE STATE OF REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANYAKUMARI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

( CRIME NO. 118 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT-16/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to cancel the Anticipatory Bail granted in Crl.OP(MD)No. 7976 of 2018 dated 16.05.2018 in favour of the respondents 1 to 15 in Crime No. 118 of 2018 on the file of the 16th respondent police. Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.K.VAMANAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.A.ROBINSON, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Government Advocate (Crl Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:- The petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted in favour of the accused on the ground that anticipatory bail was granted on the premise that the de facto complainant was discharged from the hospital. Actually, when the anticipatory bail was granted the de facto complainant is still in patient, this Court does agree with the petitioner's counsel that an erroneous representation has been made. Be that as it may, the fact remains that as of now the de facto complainant has been discharged from the hospital. The accused did not misuse the liberty granted by this Court in anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner/accused.

2.Hence taking note of the subsequent developments, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed accordingly. sd/- 13/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANYAKUMARI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.3980 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.7976 of 2018 Date :13/06/2018 tsg AE/PN/RNB/14.06.2018/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/