Saravana Kumar v. The Commissioner Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9334 of 2017 Saravanakumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Maduari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai District.

3.Sivasubramanian

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent not to interfere in civil dispute and haras the petitioner under the guise of enquiry without following due process of law.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For R1 and R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulingabharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

According to the petitioner, the petitioner has been harassed at the hands of the respondent police, based on the complaint given by the third respondent. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court with the aforesaid prayer.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the complaint given by the third respondent has been enquired and the same was closed. The copy of the closure report has also been produced before this Court. 3.Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Sd/ Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III) To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Maduari District.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9334 of 2017 16.07.2018 MYR KK/PN/SAR-3/30.07.2018/2P-4C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/