R. Lingasekar Raja, v. The Director Of Town

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.07.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.13675 of 2015 R.Lingasekar Raja ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director of Town Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

2.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Thasildar, Sri Rangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli.

4.The Commissioner, The Manikandam Panchayat Union, Tiruchirappalli District.

5.The President, Manikandam Panchayat, Tiruchirappalli District.

... Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to modify the layout of Shakthi Nagar comprising in Survey No.318/2 combined with new S.F.No.123/4, 128 measuring an extent of 21 acres 11 cents situate at Oalaiyur Village, Manikandam Panchayat, Tiruchirappalli District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 20.06.2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajarajan, G.A.

ORDER

The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to modify the layout of Shakthi Nagar comprising in Survey No.318/2 combined with new S.F.No.123/4, 128 measuring an extent of 21 acres 11 cents situate at Oalaiyur Village, Manikandam Panchayat, Tiruchirappalli District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 20.06.2015. 2.Mr.M.Rajaram, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the official respondents. By consent, this Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would be suffice, if the representation of the petitioner is

disposed of, by the respondents, on merits and in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the representation of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.

5.In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, the 1st respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner, dated 20.06.2015, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner as well as to the interested parties, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar nbj To 1.The Director of Town Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

2.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Thasildar, Sri Rangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli.

4.The Commissioner, The Manikandam Panchayat Union, Tiruchirappalli District.

5.The President, Manikandam Panchayat, Tiruchirappalli District.

+one cc to Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate in SR.No.43225 W.P.(MD)No.13675 of 2015 31.07.2015 csl/ngm-ss/sar-II/26.08.2015 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/