Madras High CourtCMP(MD)/4294/2021dismissed

Tamil Selvan v. Kayal Vizhi

2022-01-10Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran,Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

C.M.P(MD)No.4294 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN C.M.P(MD)No.4294 of 2021 in C.M.A(MD)SR.No.23682 of 2021 Tamil Selvan .. Petitioner / Appellant Vs.

Kayal Vizhi .. Respondent / Respondent Prayer in C.M.P(MD)No.4294 of 2021: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 145 days in filing the appeal against the Fair order and decreetal order, dated 06.11.2019 in H.M.O.P.No.195 of 2019 on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul.

Prayer in C.M.A(MD)SR.No.23682 of 2021: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, against the fair order and decreetal order, dated 06.11.2019 made in H.M.O.P.No.195 of 2019 on file of the Family Court, Dindigul. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poornachandran For Respondent : Mr.A.Alexander

O R D E R

S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.

and DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] When the petition for condone the delay of 145 days in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal came up for admission, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/husband as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/wife submitted that the parties have settled their dispute amicably outside the Court and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.M.P(MD)No.4294 of 2021 now, they are living together and hence, nothing survives in the appeal for further adjudication.

2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on both side, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is also dismissed at the SR stage itself.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) PJL Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

To The Judge, Family Court, Dindigul.

+1 CC to M/s.M/S.A.ALEXANDER, Advocate ( SR-924[F] dated 10/01/2022 ) C.M.P(MD)No.4294 of 2021 in C.M.A(MD)SR.No.23682 of 2021 10.01.2022 RD(25.01.2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2