Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23055/2016allowed

J.V.R.Amarnath v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-01-19Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23055 of 2016 J.V.R.Amarnath ... Petitioner/Sole Accused -Vs1.State rep by The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Madurai City.

In Crime No. 73 of 2007 ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.S.Muthu Karuppan ...2nd respondent/De facto Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the case in C.C.No.98 of 2008 on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Gunasekaran For Respondent No.1 : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For Respondent No.2 : Mr.P.Saravanan

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking a direction, to call for the records relating to the case in C.C.No.98 of 2008 on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai and quash the same.

2. It is seen that the alleged offences attributed against the petitioner is under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner and the second respondent appeared in person and their identification is also verified by this Court and the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent filed a memo of compromise stating that since the matter has been compromised, the second respondent agreed to quash the above said case in C.C.No.98 of 2008 on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the nature of allegation and also considering the memo of compromise filed by the petitioner and the second respondent, this Court is of the view that there is no need to pass

any orders in this case. Therefore, the entire proceedings in C.C.No.98 of 2008 on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai in respect of the petitioner alone is, hereby, quashed and this Criminal Original Petition is allowed accordingly. The joint compromise memo shall form part of the order of this Court. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar Photo Copies of Joint Compromise Memo are enclosed. To:

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai.

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Madurai City.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 cc to MR.P.Gunasekaran ADVOCATE, SR NO:3626 vs sva/bs/23.02.2017/2p/6c Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23055 of 2016 19.01.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/