Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2307/2016ordered

L. Munin Begu v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-02-11Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eleventh day of February Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.2307 of 2016 L. MUNIN BEGU ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOOMBUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CR NO.228 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.POORNA CHANDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.12.2015, for the offences punishable under Section 366-A I.P.C., in Crime No.228 of 2015, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2. Heard Mr.S.Poornachandran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner / Accused and Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State.

3. It is seen that the petitioner was love with the victim girl and both of them eloped. On the complaint lodged by the father of the victim girl, the present case has been registered. The victim girl has been secured and the petitioner/Accused is in incarceration from 18.12.2015.

4. Taking into consideration the fact that the victim girl has been secured, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner / Accused. Accordingly, he is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions: (i) the petitioner / Accused shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur.

(ii) the petitioner / Accused shall report before the respondent police daily at 06.30 p.m., for a period of two weeks and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

(iii) the petitioner / Accused shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iv) the petitioner / Accused shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner / Accused in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner / Accused released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

5. The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not. sd/- 11/02/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANDUR.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOOMBUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S S.POORNA CHANDRAN Advocate SR.No.8178 akm/11.02.2016/ 2p-7c/jgb/dp/SAR-I

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2307 of 2016 Date :11/02/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/