← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP(MD)/4180/2018dismissed

C.Thamaraiselvan v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-06-12Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twelfth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL MP(MD) No.4180 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8406 of 2018 C.THAMARAISELVAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KK NAGAR (CRIME) POLICE STATION, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to modify the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.OP (MD)No. 8406/2018 dated 17.05.2018 and grant permission to the petitioner to abide his condition at learned Judicial Magistrate NO. II, Trichy instead of appearing before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m., for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.R.RAJESH, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mrs.ANANTHA DEVI, Governemnt Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent and of MR.

AMENULLAH KHAN, Advocate for defacto complainant the court made the following order:- This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to modify the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.8406 of 2018, dated 17.05.2018 and grant permission to the petitioner to abide his condition at learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy instead of appearing before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. 2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the defacto complainant is present before this Court and informed the Court that the petitioner had taken a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-(Rupees four lakh only) from him. F.I.R was registered only yesterday. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.

Side) rightly pointed out that the purpose of granting anticipatory bail was to enable the petitioner to co-operative with the enquiry.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Taking note of the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to modify the condition imposed earlier in Crl.O.P(MD).No.8406 of 2018. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

sd/- 12/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, TRICHY.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KK NAGAR (CRIME) POLICE STATION, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. C.C. to M/S.R.RAJESH Advocate SR.No.10210 GJM/CM/VR/RNB/18.6.18-2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.4180 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8406 of 2018 Date :12/06/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/