Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23155/2016allowed

Vasantha Kumar, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-01-19Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23155 of 2016 1.Vasantha Kumar 2.Kumar @ Perumal ... Petitioners -Vs1.The State Rep by its, The Inspector of Police, Moolakaraipatty Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.138/2016) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Siva Balasubramanian ...2nd Respondent/ De facto - Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records relating to the proceedings of the FIR in Crime No.138 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Durai Raj For Respondent No.1 : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.Jeya Paul for R-2

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking a direction, to call for the entire records relating to the proceedings of the FIR in Crime No.138 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same.

2. It is seen that the alleged offences attributed against the petitioners are under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners and the second respondent appeared in person and their identification is also verified by this Court and the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent filed a memo of compromise stating that since the matter has been compromised, the second respondent agreed to quash the above said case in CR.No.138 of 2016 pending on the file of the first respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the nature of allegation and also considering the memo of compromise filed by the petitioners and

the second respondent, this Court is of the view that there is no need to pass any orders in this case. Therefore, the entire proceedings in Cr.No.138 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent in respect of the petitioners alone is, hereby, quashed and this Criminal Original Petition is allowed accordingly. The joint compromise memo shall form part of the order of this Court. Sd Assistant Regisrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Regisrar To:

1.The Inspector of Police, Moolakaraipatty Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23155 of 2016 19.01.2017 vs kk/cm.msa/20.2.2017/2p.3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/