Rajasekar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/07/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD). No.7308 of 2020 Rajasekar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station, Kanniyakumari District.
Cr.No. 695 of 2020.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.K.Jeya Aron Raja, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 695 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC Act, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Heard both sides.
3.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant and attacked him with Aruval and also caused injury. Hence, the complaint.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the injured person was already discharged from the hospital.
6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that injured was already discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 13.07.2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
DAS Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District.
2. -Do- Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil.
3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station, Kanniyakumari District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7308 of 2020 Date : 13/07/2020 VB SKN SAR 3 (15.07.2020) 3P 5C