← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9885/2017ordered

Thangavel Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-07-31Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirty First day of July Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD) No.9885 of 2017 THANGAVEL PANDIAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THALAVAIPURAM POLICE STATION, THALAVAIPURAM, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT CRIME NO.274/2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as sole accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.07.2017 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 307 IPC, in Crime No.274 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital on 17.07.2017. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 03.07.

2017 onwards, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions: (i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam. (ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks thereafter as and when https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

required for interrogation.

(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iv) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 31/07/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAJAPALAYAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 OFFICER IN CHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THALAVAIPURAM POLICE STATION, THALAVAIPURAM, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate SR.No.27643

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9885 of 2017 Date :31/07/2017 MKV-CM-MSA-SAR 3/1.8.2017/2P-7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/