Alagesan. M v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.03.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Alagesan. M ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Theni District.
2. The Inspector of Police, P.C.Patti Police Station, Theni District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the rejection order in Na.Ka.No. 08/Ka.Aa.A/P.C patti/2023, dated 01.03.2023, passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to grant permission and protection to perform cultural events i.e., Adal Padal programme scheduled to be held on 06.04.2023 Panguni Festival at Arulmigu Sri Kaliyamman Temple at Aranmanai Pudhur, Theni district.
1/5
For Petitioner : Mr. Thamimul Ansari. N For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R
This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the rejection order in Na.Ka.No.08/Ka.Aa.A/P.C patti/2023, dated 01.03.2023, passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to grant permission and protection to perform cultural events i.e., Adal Padal programme scheduled to be held on 06.04.2023 Panguni Festival at Arulmigu Sri Kaliyamman Temple at Aranmanai Pudhur, Theni district.
2. Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that festival for the temple, by name, "Arulmigu Sri Kaliyamman Temple at Aranmanai Pudhur, Theni district", is going to be held on 04.04.2023 2/5
to 06.04.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on 06.04.2023, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 28.02.2023. But, the second respondent has considered and rejected the said representation. Challenging the same, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that if fresh representation is given to the second respondent, the same will be considered.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
6. It is noted that the second respondent police without considering the circular of the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 passed the impugned order.
7. In view of the circular issued by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019, 3/5
rejection order in Na.Ka.No.08/Ka.Aa.A/P.C.Patti/2023, dated 01.03.2023, passed by the 2nd respondent is hereby set aside. The writ petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the second respondent and on such representation, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular and the time for conducting the cultural programme may be fixed by the concerned authority, depending upon the situation in the locality. 8.With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
29.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Indu To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Theni District.
2. The Inspector of Police, P.C.Patti Police Station, Theni District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
G.ILANGOVAN, J Indu Order made in Dated : 29.03.2023 5/5