P.Ravichandran, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of August Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD) No.9964 of 2017 P.RAVICHANDRAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIYANAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.119 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT(S) For Petitioner : M/S.R.VENKATESAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as Accused No.4, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,148,294(b),324,307 of IPC r/w Section 34 of IPC in P.R.C.No.17 of 2017 in Crime No.119 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to a civil dispute, the Petitioner along with 15 persons said to have threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences and abused him in filthy language.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to a civil dispute, the de-facto complaint has lodged the present complaint against the Petitioner and other 15 persons and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation isover and and final report has also been filed. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(i) the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. (ii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iii) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 01/08/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KARUR. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIYANAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.VENKATESAN Advocate SR.No.27784 VSN CSL/RR-BS/SAR-I/03.08.2017 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9964 of 2017 Date :01/08/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/