← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6029/2021dismissed

Ramasamy Chettiyar v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-08-24Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24.08.2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI 1.Ramasamy Chettiyar 2.Ankayarkanni 3.Arunkumar ... Petitioners/Accused1,2,4 Vs the state rep.by The Inspector of Police, K.Pudur Police Station, K.Pudur, Madurai District.

Cr.No.286 of 2021.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Loganathan For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, Party in Person PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.286 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 294(b), 323, 427, 506(i) and 379 IPC in Crime No.286 of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is an Advocate. The petitioners entered into the 1/3

chamber of the defacto complainant and quarrelled with him and locked the room. They abused him in filthy language with regard to the suit in O.S.No.17 of 2021 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sivagangai. They have also snatched the gold chain of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that they have collected CCTV footage from the High Court chamber and found that the petitioners have come to the defacto complainant's chamber and locked the same. They were inside for more than thirty minutes and thereafter, they came out from there. Some wordy quarrel was taken place, which was recorded in CCTV footage.

5.Considering facts and circumstance of the case and considering the seriousness of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. sd/- 02/09/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

GNS Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

2/3

TO 1.The Inspector of Police, K.Pudur Police Station, K.Pudur, Madurai District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No.6029 of 2021 Date :24/08/2021 KB/SKN/SAR-(09.09.2021) 3P 3C 3/3