Singaravel v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the First day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.9392 and 10402 of 2018 1 SINGARAVEL 2 S.MURUGAVEL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 & 2 IN BOTH THE PETITIONS Vs STATE THROUGH, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH(DCB), VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT., IN CR NO. 4/2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN CRL OP(MD)No.9392/2018 IN CR NO. 5/2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN CRL OP(MD)No.10402/2018 For Petitioner : MR.MARIAPPAN, for MR.M.DINESH Advocate IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Intervenor : MR.AJMAL KHAN, Senior Counsel IN BOTH THE PETITIONS PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 r/w. 34 IPC in Crime Nos.4 and 5 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the matter has been
amicably resolved and they have filed a compromise memo before this Court, seeking to close the First Information Reports in Crime Nos.4 and 5 of 2018. Since the issue itself is resolved, the respondents is directed to close the First Information Reports in Crime Nos.4 and 5 of 2018, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The said closure report shall be filed before the Judicial Magistrate within two weeks, thereafter. Since a direction has been given for closing these First Information Reports itself, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail. These Criminal Original Petitions are ordered accordingly. The Compromise Memo signed by the parties shall form part of the order. It is made clear that question of arrest, does not arise at all. sd/- 01/08/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
ENCL: THE XEROX COPY OF COMPROMISE MEMO TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH(DCB), VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+2. CC to MR.M.DINESH, Advocate SR.Nos.14645,14645 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9392 & 10402 of 2018 Date :01/08/2018 PK/RR/SAR-4/10.08.2018 : 2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/