P.Sekar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirteenth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.9406 of 2018 1 P.SEKAR 2 CHIKKAN ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIRUGANUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.116 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners: Mr.B.JAMEEL ARASU, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of IPC., in Crime No. 116 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

3. One Saravanan is the defacto complainant. On account of a property dispute, the occurrence has taken place. The victim was hit on head with an iron rod. The injured is still in hospital.

4. Taken into account, the nature of attack, this Court is of the view that it is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 13/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIRUGANUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1CC TO Mr.M.R.SREENIVASAN, ADVOCATE, SR NO.10315

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9406 of 2018 Date :13/06/2018 MS/PN/VK/20.06.2018/2P.4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/