Natrayasamy.K v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.(MD)No.7722 of 2022 K.Natrayasamy ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palani, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.
4.Harichandran 5.Kalidas 6.Sakthivel ... Respondents 1/4
Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection based on the representation of the petitioner dated 12.04.2022.
For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 30.01.2024, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the petition was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 01.02.2024. Even today (01.02.2024), inspite of the matter being listed under the said caption, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. 01.02.2024 tta 2/4
To:
1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palani, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
tta W.P.(MD)No.7772 of 2022 01.02.2024 4/4