Shahaya Ravichandran, v. The Inspector Of Police,

CRL MP(MD). No.4274 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/09/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL MP(MD). No.4274 of 2019 in CRL OP(MD). No.2966 of 2019 Shahaya Ravichandran,, ... Petitioner/ Defacto complainant Vs

1. The State rep.by The Inspector of Police,, Panagudi Police Station, Panagudi, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.56 of 2019). ... Respondent/Complainant

2. Winsly, ... Respondent/Accused For Petitioner : M/s. S. Palanivelayutham, Advocate.

For R-1 : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R-2 : Mr.P.Mani Anandh PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- To pass an order to cancel the order of Anticipatory Bail as made in Crl.OP(MD)No.2966 of 2019 dated 26.02.2019 in favour of the 2nd respondent in connection with Cr.No.56 of 2019 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Panagudi, Tirunelveli District forthwith.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The second respondent herein was granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 26.02.2019 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2966 of 2019. To cancel the same, the defacto complainant has taken out this petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL MP(MD). No.4274 of 2019

3. The contention of the defacto complainant is that he had sold the vehicle to the second respondent herein. The understanding between the petitioner and the second respondent was that the second respondent would clear the remaining dues payable in respect of the vehicle and that the second respondent has not honoured the terms of sale. The specific allegation of the petitioner's counsel is that the second respondent has made it appear before this Court as if the entire sale amount was paid to the petitioner herein.

4. I carefully went through the order passed this Court. No where any such statement as alleged by the petitioner herein has been recorded. Therefore, I am of the view that no case for cancellation of anticipatory bail has been made out. This Criminal Miscellaneous petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 04/09/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VALLIYOOR.

2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANAGUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.P.MANI ANANDH, Advocate ( SR-14935[I] dated 06/09/2019 ) +1 CC TO MR.S.PALANI VELAYUTHAM, Advocate in SR.No.85374

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.4274 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2966 of 2019 Date :04/09/2019 pmu AE/VR/SAR-III (10.09.2019) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2