Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23724/2016disposed of

A.Mohamed Ali v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-01-02Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23724 of 2016

1. A.Mohamed Ali

2. N.Sithi Sulaika ..Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 Vs

1. The State through The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Virudhunagar Virudhunagar District. .. Respondent No.1/ Complainant

2. M.Syed Fathima.

.. Respondent No.2/ De facto Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records connected with the case in Crime No.20 of 2015, pending on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioners : Mr.I.Sabeer Mohamed For R1 : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R2 : Mr.A.Abdul Kabur

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to quash the entire proceedings in Crime No.20 of 2015, pending on the file of the 1st respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the first respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that based on the complaint given by the second respondent/de facto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioners in Cr.No.20 of 2015 for the offences under Sections 497 and 506(i) IPC., on the file of the first respondent police. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, both the petitioners as well as the second respondent are appeared in

person and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) through the respondent police and they categorically made a statement that the dispute between them have been settled amicably. They also filed a joint memo of compromise dated 20.12.2016, duly signed by both parties and counter signed by their respective Counsel.

5. In view of the above, since the dispute between the parties was amicably settled out of Court, there is no necessity to keep this case pending. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.20 of 2015 for the offences under Sections 497 and 506(i) IPC., on the file of the first respondent is hereby quashed. The joint memo of compromise shall form a part of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.I.Sabeer Mohamed Advocate in SR. No.236/12 PJL JS/SV/MMS/08.02.2017/2P-4C Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23724 of 2016 02.01.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/