Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4980/2024granted

Pandi v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-03-28Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI PANDI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHECKANURANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.86/2024) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.C.SENTHIL MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.NAMBISELVAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. PRAYER:

FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CRIME NO.86/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused No.2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Crime No.86 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/5

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons were found in illegal possession of 1 kg 500 Gms of Ganja and thereafter, the respondent Police seized the ganja from the accused persons. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police would submit that totally 1 kg 500 gms of Ganja were recovered from the accused persons. He would further submit that no previous case is pending against the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the seized contraband is not a commercial quantity, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/5

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and he is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Special Court for NDPS Act Cases Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)if the petitioner failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 A.M.

3/5

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(g) However, after the seizure procedure is over, the concerned Magistrate and the respondent Police are directed to comply with the guidelines enumerated under section 52(A) of the NDPS Act and as per the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Union of India Vs. Mohanlal and Another ((2016) 3 SCC 379) and; 4/5

(h)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 28/03/2024 / TRUE COPY / /04/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TSG TO 1 THE JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT FOR NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHECKANURANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.A.SELVA KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-3889[I] dated 28/03/2024 )

ORDER

IN Date :28/03/2024 SS/GS/SAR- /08/04/2024/5P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5