Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16291/2014dismissed as infructuous

A.Anthony Raj v. The Superintending

2019-07-04Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) Nos.16291, 16293, 16308 & 16320 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 (in all W.Ps.) A.Anthony Raj ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.16291 / 2014 L.Jeyapoornakala ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.16293 / 2014 A.Angel Selvam ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.16308 / 2014 S.Jesuraja Selvam ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.16320 / 2014 vs.

1.The Superintending Engineer Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle TANGEDCO, Maharajanagar Tirunelveli-627 011 2.S.P.Construction 28A, Sundaravinayagar Koil Street Palaya Pettai, Tirunelveli-627 008 3.The Inspector of Labour O/o.The Inspector of Labour Tirunelveli ... Respondents in all W.Ps.

PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) Nos.16291, 16308 & 16320 of 2014): Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to not to alter the services of the petitioner pending disposal of the proceedings under the Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act 1981, before the 3rd Respondent. PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) No.16293 of 2014): Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to not to alter the services of the petitioner pending disposal of the proceedings under the Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act 1981, before the 3rd Respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioner :

Ms.M.Nandhini Priyadharshini (in all W.Ps.) for Ms.D.Geetha For Respondents :

Ms.P.Malini (in all W.Ps.) M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co. for R1 No appearance for R2 Mr.K.Mu.Muthu Additional Government Pleader for R3 C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners submitted that the relief sought for in these writ petitions has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement so made, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) krk To:

The Inspector of Labour, O/o.The Inspector of Labour, Tirunelveli.

+1CC TO MR.P.MALINI, Advocate Sr. No.73603 +1CC TO MR.D.GEETHA, Advocate Sr. No.73856 +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.No. 73814 W.P.(MD) Nos.16291, 16293, 16308 & 16320 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 (in all W.Ps.) 04.07.2019 KMV(CO) TR (16.07.2019) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/