Subbiah, S/O Chinnakaruppan v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24087 of 2016 SUBBIAH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.9 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.ARAVIND SUBRAMANIAM, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.P.KANDASAMY, GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, in Crime No.9 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 498(A) of I.P.C and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted that this is a case of matrimonial dispute and the petitioner is the husband of the defacto complainant and the allegation is that the petitioner demanded dowry from the defacto complainant and harassed her.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that this is a case of matrimonial dispute, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/12/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.ARAVIND SUBRAMANIAM Advocate SR.No.83811 PM TE/PM/SAR-I/30.12.2016 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.24087 of 2016 Date :29/12/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/