← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7556/2020ordered

Sathish @ Sarvesh Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-07-24Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24/07/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD). No.7556 of 2020 Sathish @ Sarvesh Kumar ... Petitioner/3rd Accused Vs State, Through the Inspector of Police, Bazaar Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.337 of 2020).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.B.Kaleeshwaran,Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Chandrasekaran, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.337 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Totally there are 11 accused in this case. The petitioner is figuring as accused No.3 in Crime No.337 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 336, 307, 506(ii) and 379 of I.P.C. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, on the date of occurrence the petitioner along with other accused are said to have attacked the de-facto complainant and caused head injury. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that A-1 and A-2 were already arrested and released on bail by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram in Crl.M.P.No.1129 of 2020, on 11.06.2020. He would further submit that there is no overt act attributed against the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State would submit that due to previous enmity, on the date of occurrence the petitioner along with other accused are said to have

attacked the de-facto complainant and caused head injury and injured was also discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the co-accused were already arrested and released on bail and the injured was also discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the petitioner/accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 24/07/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram.

2. Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Bazaar Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7556 of 2020 Date : 24/07/2020 SMA/RSK/SAR-II/27/07/2020/3P/5C