Senthil Kumar, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24167 of 2016 SENTHIL KUMAR, ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

IN CR.NO.862/2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused, in Crime No.862 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent / State.

3. The case of the prosecution is that during midnight of 18.11.2016, the de facto complainant's vehicle bearing registration No.TN58 AK0033 was set fire.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any such offence and he has nothing to do with present case and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., and 05.30 p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/12/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRTE MADURAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.24 GJM/SKS/RR/SAR-2-3.1.17-2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.24167 of 2016 Date :29/12/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/