R. Rajagopal v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.02.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.S.RAVI W.P.(MD)No.1554 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 R.Rajagopal ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3.Palanisamy ... Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to stop the installation of third respondent's poultry form at N.Thiruvenkadapuram Colony, Achamthavilthan Village, Virudhunagar District by taking into account of the petitioner's representation dated 28.11.2014 within a reasonable period of time.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajini For Respondents 1 & 2: Mr.N.Manoharan, Spl.G.P.

ORDER

(Order of this Court was made by S.TAMILVANAN,J.) The Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking an order in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to stop the installation of poultry form by the third respondent at N.Thiruvenkadapuram Colony, Achamthavilthan Village, Virudhunagar District, pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner on 28.11.2014. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner drew the attention of this Court to the copy of the representation sent to the respondents 1 and 2.

4.Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, we find it just and reasonable to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.11.2014 and pass appropriate orders, after providing reasonable opportunity to the third respondent and others, if any. 5.Accordingly, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.11.2014 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after providing reasonable opportunity to the third respondent and others.

6.The petitioner is directed to furnish the copy of the representation to the respondents 1 and 2 along with the copy of this order.

7.In the result, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C.O.,) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

+1cc to Mr.A.Rajini, Advocate, in SR. No.5959. +1cc to Special Government Pleader, in SR No.6037. W.P.(MD)No.1554 of 2015 09.02.2015 nbj msm 25.02.2015 p2/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/