Rajagopal v. The District Revenue Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.04.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.8413 of 2024 Rajagopal ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.01.2024 within a time frame stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vinoharan For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambi Durai Government Advocate 1/4

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.All that the petitioner wants is consideration of the petition mentioned representation. The first respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the first respondent to pass order one way or the other. The first respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

03.04.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA 2/4

To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram District.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

MGA W.P.(MD)No.8413 of 2024 03.04.2024 4/4