← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8502/2024disposed of

Sahul Hameed .M v. The Managing Director

2024-04-03Honourable Ms Justice R.N.Manjula6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.04.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA W.P.(MD) No.8502 of 2024 M.Sahul Hameed ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Managing Director Aavin, Madavaram Central Milk Department, Chennai 2.The Manager Aavin, Madavaram Central Milk Department, Chennai.

3.M.Ragu @ Abdul Rahman ... Respondents 1/6

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Nos.1 & 2 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 20.03.2024 sent in connection with the Crime No.67 of 2024 on the file of Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District, as expeditiously as possible within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.I Kalantar Aasik Ahamadu For Respondents : Mr.Devasenan - for R1 & R2 Standing counsel

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Nos.1 & 2 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 20.03.2024 sent in connection with the Crime No.67 of 2024 on the file of Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram 2/6

District.

2. Heard Mr.I Kalantar Aasik Ahamadu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Devasenan, learned Standing counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.

3. By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent is an employee under the respondents 1 and 2 and he has involved in a criminal case and a case has been registered against the third respondent in Crime No.67 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 143, 448, 294(b), 323, 355 and 506(i) IPC on the complaint given by the petitioner. It is learnt that the petitioner has also sent a representation to the respondents 1 and 2 to initiate departmental action against the third respondent. 3/6

5. The third respondent is the petitioner's brother's son-in-law. It appears that there is some family dispute between the petitioner and the Government servant has taken shape of this Writ Petition.

6. Since a criminal case has already been registered, the law will take its own course and any action against the Government servant will depend upon the course and result of the investigation.

7. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

03.04.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No RM 4/6

To 1.The Managing Director Aavin, Madavaram Central Milk Department, Chennai 2.The Manager Aavin, Madavaram Central Milk Department, Chennai.

5/6

R.N.MANJULA , J.

RM Order made in W.P.(MD)No.8502 of 2024 Dated:

03.04.2024 6/6