Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17027/2014dismissed

M. Muthulakshmi, v. The District Collector,

2015-02-18Honourable Mr Justice T.Mathivanan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 18.02.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN WP(MD)No.17027 of 2014 and MP(MD)Nos. 1 and 2 of 2014 M.Muthulakshmi .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.Murali Ramba IPS, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Kovilpatti Sub-Division, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

5.K.Ajukumar Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

.. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the first respondent from invoking Act 14 of 1982 against the petitioner's son namely Gnanam @ Venkatesh in view of the false case foisted in Crime No.999 of 2014 dated 02.10.2014 pending on the file of the fourth respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For RR - 1 to 4 : Mr.M.Azhaguthevan Govt.Advocate For R - 5 : No appearance

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.) This Writ Petition has been filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus so as to forbear the first respondent from invoking Act 14 of 1982 against the petitioner's son namely Gnanam @ Venkatesh. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. It is averred in the petition that the son of the petitioner has been arrayed as one of the accused in a case registered in Crime No.997 of 2014, West Police Station, Kovilpatti, wherein he made his surrender on 01.10.2014. But the Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Kovilpatti has foisted a case in Crime No.999 of 2014 on 02.10.2014 so as to make it as a ground case for invoking Act 14 of 1982 against the son of the petitioner. Under the said circumstances, the present Petition has been filed for getting the relief sought for therein.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has reiterated the averments made in the petition by way of argument.

4. The learned Government Advocate has made an endorsement on the petition to the effect that the proceedings of the Inspector of Police to invoke Act 14 of 1982 against the son of the petitioner has been rejected by the detaining authority/first respondent herein.

5. Considering the endorsement made on the side of the respondents, the relief sought for in the petition has become infructuous and therefore, this petition deserves to be dismissed.

6. In fine, this Writ Petition is dismissed. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar mj To 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.Murali Ramba IPS, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Kovilpatti Sub-Division, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 5.K.Ajukumar Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Thoothukudi District. +1cc to Special Government Pleader Sr NO.8007 WP(MD)No.17027 of 2014 and MP(MD)NOS.1 AND 2 OF 2014 18.02.2015 rg.18.03.2015 2p.7c.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/