← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6139/2025allowed

Sasitharan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2025-04-03Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.6139 of 2025 Sasitharan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Inspector of Police, Parthibanoor Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.157 of 2013) 2.Murugan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.157 of 2013, on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as far as this petitioner is concerned.

For petitioner :Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.Shenbaga Raj Page No. 1 of 4

*****

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No. 157 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 & 506(ii) of IPC and quash the same.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

3. The defacto-complainant and the accused are present and this Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto-complainant represented that the matter has been amicably settled between them and they entered into a compromise and also he has no objection to quash the FIR. A compromise memo, dated 19.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsel, is also filed before this Court.

4. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo. Page No. 2 of 4

5. Considering the nature of the offences and the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

6. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No.157 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed, against this petitioner. 03.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1.The Inspector of Police, Parthibanoor Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 3 of 4

P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.6139 of 2025 03.04.2025 Page No. 4 of 4