L.Ravi, S/O.Lakshmana Perumal v. The Inspector General Of

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.BASHEER AHAMED W.P.[MD].No.12717 of 2018 L.Ravi : Petitioner Vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, 80, Santhome Highway Road, Mylapore, Chennai-4.

2. The District Registrar, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

3. The Sub Registrar, Kanyakumari Joint-I, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

4.M.Palpandian : Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent dated 22.05.2018 issued in No.1459/A1/2018 and to quash the same and consequentially direct the second respondent herein to invoke Sections 68(2) and 69 of the Registration Act and as well as Circular issued by the first respondent dated 08.11.2017 in Letter No.41530/U1/2017 and to cancel or annul the fraudulent registration of Trust, namely, Vadalivilai Oor Sri Mutharamman Temple, Hindu Nadar Samuthaya Vagai Trust Document No.356 of 2015 dated 30.11.2015 registered before the third respondent within a stipulated time.

For petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For respondents : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate

O R D E R

*********** [Order of the Court was made by C.T.SELVAM, J.] Challenge in this Writ Petition is to the proceedings of the second respondent dated 22.05.2018, in No.1459/A1/2018 and for a direction to the second respondent herein to invoke Sections 68(2) and 69 of the Registration Act, as well as Circular issued by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

first respondent in Letter No.41530/U1/2017 dated 08.11.2017 and to cancel or annul the fraudulent registration of Trust, namely, Vadalivilai Oor Sri Mutharamman Temple, Hindu Nadar Samuthaya Vagai Trust registered under Document No.356 of 2015, dated 30.11.2015, registered before the third respondent.

2. Though much has been said by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the grievance of the petitioner, in effect, is that by registration of trust deed, as Document No.356 of 2015, dated 30.11.2015, the fourth respondent might gain mileage in respect of the control over matters and properties relating to a private temple.

3. We have perused the order passed by the second respondent herein dated 22.05.2018. We find no error in the order passed by the second respondent. As rightly informed by the second respondent, if the petitioner is aggrieved, in any manner, owing to the registration of the trust deed, it is for him to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum. We make it clear that we are not expressing any view on the merits or otherwise of the case of the petitioner.

4. The Writ Petition is dismissed with the above observation. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, 80, Santhome Highway Road, Mylapore, Chennai-4.

2. The District Registrar, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

3. The Sub Registrar, Kanyakumari Joint-I, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

+1cc to Mr.A.Saravanan, Advocate Sr.No.68160 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.68477 NB VB/SV/MMS/SAR1/29.06.2018/2P/6C ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD].No.12717 of 2018 14.06.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/