Mathankumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighth day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.268 of 2016 1 MATHANKUMAR 2 SELVI 3 MAHESH ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 to 4 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAYENAICKANOR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 8 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.M.JEGADEESAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 to A4 in Crime No.8 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and the de-facto complainant are belongs to same village and due to previous motive, the petitioners abused the de-facto complainant with filthy language and threatened him and also attacked him. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instruction would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 08/01/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAYENAICKANOR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S M.JEGADEESAN Advocate SR.No.1724 akm/12.01.2016/ 2p-6c/MP/PM/SAR-II

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.268 of 2016 Date :08/01/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/