← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17112/2014disposed of

M.Ravichandran v. The Director Of

2016-03-08Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.03.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Writ Petition (MD) No.17112 of 2014 M.Ravichandran .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Director of Rural Development, and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

2. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

3. The Joint Director/Project Officer, 'Mahalir Thittam', Reserve Line, Narayanapuram, Madurai - 14.

.. Respondents Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to award selection grade to the petitioner for completing 10 years of service in the Assistant Cadre, in view of the proceedings given by the 3rd respondent, dated 17.05.2012 to the 2nd respondent and consequently pay the arrears of salary with applicable interest from the year 2009 within a stipulated period.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sathish Babu For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking for the issue of a writ of mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to award selection grade to the petitioner for completing 10 years of service in the Assistant Cadre, in view of the proceedings given by the 3rd respondent, dated 17.05.2012 to the 2nd respondent and consequently pay the arrears of salary with applicable interest from the year 2009 within a stipulated period.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.According to the petitioner, the third respondent has already

sent a proceedings, dated 17.02.2012, to the second respondent to award selection grade to the petitioner for completing 10 years of service in the Assistant Cadre and the same is still pending. Since no order has been passed, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition. 4.Considering the above stated facts and circumstances and without expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to pass orders on the proceedings of the second respondent, dated 17.05.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Director of Rural Development, and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

2. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

3. The Joint Director/Project Officer, 'Mahalir Thittam', Reserve Line, Narayanapuram, Madurai - 14.

+ 1 CC TO MR.N.SATHISH BABU, ADVOCATE IN SR NO. 13094 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR NO.13228 RJ2 TE/SKS-RR/ : 23/03/2016 : 2P/6C Writ Petition (MD) No.17112 of 2014 08.03.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/