A.Arunkumar v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep By The Director General Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.06.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl. OP(MD).No.5505 of 2026 A.Arunkumar ....Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs 1.The Director General of Police Mylapore, Chennai - 4 2.The Additional Director General of Police (Cyber Crime Wing) Police Training College No.3, Dr.Natesan Road Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 83 3.The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar 4.The Additional Superintendent of Police Cyber Crime Wing Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar 5.The Inspector of Police CCD-III Virudhunagar Virudhunagar District Crime No.47 of 2025 ....Respondents 1/5
Prayer:This petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to issue a direction to entrust the investigation in Crime No.47 of 2025 dated 06.10.2025 pending on the file of the 5th respondent to the 4th respondent and to conduct the investigation under strict supervision under the control of the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthick Ramkumar For Respondents : Mr.J.Vishnu Government Advocate (Crl.side)
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by the defacto complainant in Crime No.47 of 2025 on the file of the 5th respondent police seeking to transfer the investigation to the file of the 4th respondent for conducting proper investigation.
2.A perusal of the F.I.R reveals that the petitioner herein is the victim of Cyber Crime and he has lost more than Rs.76,00,000/-. According to the petitioner, many other persons have also lost money in the Cyber Crime. He further submits that the accused persons are located in different State. In such circumstances, according to him, the Station House Officer of the 5th respondent would find it difficult to continue with the investigation process. Therefore, he seeks transfer.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the 5th respondent had raised strong objection for transferring the investigation from 2/5
the 5th respondent to the 4th respondent and submitted that huge sum of money has already been recovered from the accused persons and there is no necessity for transferring the investigation from the 5th respondent to the 4th respondent.
4.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused material records.
5.The only grievance of the petitioner is that for administrative convenience and for proper interaction with the police officials of the other States, he seeks transfer of investigation from the 5th respondent to the 4th respondent. He had also submitted that he is not making any allegation as against the 5th respondent police.
6.Considering the above said facts, the investigation in Crime No.47 of 2025 on the file of the 5th respondent is hereby transferred to the file of the 4th respondent. It is made clear that this Court has not made any adverse remarks as against the 5th respondent herein and only for administrative convenience and for the effective investigation, it is being transferred to the 4th respondent. The 4th respondent is directed to complete the investigation within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7.With the above said observation, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.
04.06.2026 3/5
Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No msa To 1.The Director General of Police Mylapore, Chennai - 4 2.The Additional Director General of Police (Cyber Crime Wing) Police Training College No.3, Dr.Natesan Road Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 83 3.The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar 4.The Additional Superintendent of Police Cyber Crime Wing Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar 5.The Inspector of Police CCD-III Virudhunagar Virudhunagar District Crime No.47 of 2025 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai 4/5
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
msa Crl. OP(MD).No.5505 of 2026 04.06.2026 5/5