S.Guruvammal v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.17177 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014, 1 of 2015 and 8865 of 2016 S.Guruvammal ... Petitioner -Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Food and Co-operation, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2. The Controller of Examinations, State Recruitment Bureau for Co-operatives, NV Natarajan Maaligai, First Floor, 170, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-10.
...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the writ petitioner for appointment to the post of Assistant in the respondent Co-operative Institutions in pursuance to the participation in the interview held on 27.01.2013 within the time period stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.M.Jeyakumar, Additional Government Pleader.
ORDER
The relief sought for in the present Writ Petition is for a direction to direct the second respondent to consider the claim of the writ petitioner for appointment to the post of Assistant in the respondent Co-operative institutions, pursuant to the participation in the interview held on 27.01.2013. 2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner states that pursuant to the recruitment notification issued for appointment to the post of Assistant, the writ petitioner participated and attended the interview. The writ petitioner was successful in the written examination. However, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the result regarding the selection is yet to be notified. The reason for delay in declaring the result, is also not stated. This apart, whether the process of selection has been concluded or cancelled is also not made clear by the respondents. 3.Appointment can never be claimed as a matter of right. All appointments are to be made strictly in accordance with rules in force. In the event of publication of selection list, if the writ petitioner is selected on merits as well as by following the rule of reservation, then the case of the writ petitioner is to be considered for appointment.
4.Under these circumstances, if the writ petitioner is selected in the process of selection and fully qualified for appointment, then the case is to be considered along with all other candidates, who are selected, pursuant to the said recruitment notification.
5.With these observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Myr To
1. The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Food and Co-operation, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2. The Controller of Examinations, State Recruitment Bureau for Co-operatives, NV Natarajan Maaligai, First Floor, 170, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-10.
+ 1 CC to The Special Government Pleader SR.No.73501 W.P(MD)No.17177 of 2014 03.07.2019 KS(12.07.2019) 2 P 4 C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/