Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16122/2015disposed of

A.Muthuraaja v. Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv

2016-11-14Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.11.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Writ Petition (MD) No.16122 of 2015 A.Muthuraaja ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director, 6th Floor, Duckker Towers, 36/123, Marshals Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

2.The General Manager (Planning and Projects) Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Old No.34, New No.123, 6th Floor, Duckker Towers, 36/123, Marshals Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

3.The Special Tashildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Television Corporation Limited, Door No-105, Forest Road, Sivaji Nagar, Theni 625 531, Theni District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to execute the proceedings dated 13.07.2013 and its No.1/2013 to the petitioner's as a Sub MSO in the locality of the Chinamanoor Theni District and install the necessary equipments required to resume the petitioners business as a local cable TV operator registered with the 1st respondent vide LCO No: 16870. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kevinkaran For Respondents : Mr.Abdul Saleem for Mr.S.Sathishkumar

ORDER

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to execute the proceedings dated 13.07.2013 as a Sub MSO in the locality of Chinamanoor, Theni District and install necessary equipments required to resume the petitioner's business as a local cable TV operator registered with the 1st respondent vide LCO No: 16870.

2.Heard Mr.K.Kevin Karan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Abdul Saleem, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3.The petitioner said to have submitted an application requesting for Sub MSO on 13.07.2013 to the third respondent who in turn, after considering the case of the petitioner, recommended the application of the petitioner to the second respondent which is still pending. Hence, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

4.When the matter came up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that the respondents will issue necessary proceedings on the application of the petitioner in accordance with law.

5.In the above circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 13.07.2013 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar sms To 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., 6th Floor, Duckker Towers, 36/123, Marshals Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

2.The General Manager (Planning and Projects) Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Old No.34, New No.123, 6th Floor, Duckker Towers, 36/123, Marshals Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

3.The Special Tashildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Door No-105, Forest Road, Sivaji Nagar, Theni 625 531, Theni District.

+1cc to Mr.k.Kevin Karan Advocate Sr.No. 69240 JAM/14.12.16/PV/3p-5c Writ Petition (MD) No.16122 of 2015 14.11.2016