Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/695/2021closed

T.Nagarathinam v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-06-11Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram,Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

H.C.P.(MD) No.695 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :11.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN H.C.P.(MD) No.695 of 2021 T.Nagarathinam ... Petitioner Mother of detenue -vs1.The State rep. by its The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The State rep. by its The Inspector of Police, Kallal Police Station, Kallal, Sivagangai District.

3.V.Ilayaraja ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus to direct the second respondent to produce the body or person of the detenue namely, T.Meenakshi daughter of T.Nagarathinam aged about 17 years old before this Court and hand over the custody to the petitioner. For Petitioner :

Mr.AK.Gopalan For Respondents :

Mr.S.Ravi Standing Counsel for Tamil Nadu Government (for R1 and R2)

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.] This habeas corpus petition has been filed for a direction to the second respondent to produce the petitioner's daughter, namely, T.Meenakshi, aged about 17 years old before this Court and hand over her custody to the petitioner.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the petitioner as well as the detenue appeared before this Court through video conferencing from the Public Prosecutor's Office. On enquiry, the detenue has agreed to go with her mother, the petitioner herein, who is also accepted the same.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

H.C.P.(MD) No.695 of 2021 3.In the light of the above statement, this habeas corpus petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) skn Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kallal Police Station, Kallal, Sivagangai District.

3.The Standing Counsel for Tamil Nadu Government, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

H.C.P.(MD) No.695 of 2021 11.06.2021 KB(25.06.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2