Venkadesan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of February Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.2957 of 2016 1 VENKADESAN 2 KATHAN 3 GOWRI 4 MURUGAN 5 IMMACULATE MERCEY @ MERCEY 6 VASANTHI 7 BALAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 7 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VADAMADURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 24 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S AN.RAMANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No. 24 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 498(A), 109 and 406 IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. 3.Earlier these petitioners were granted anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.24527 of 2015 on 12.01.2016 on condition that they should execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready. Since the petitioners were not able to muster the sureties within the time fixed by this Court, the earlier order lapsed and hence, the petitioners are before this Court with this petition for anticipatory bail. Taking into consideration this aspect, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners 2 to 7 shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] The Inspector of Police is directed to send compliance report to the office of the Government Advocate (Crl. Side) as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not. sd/- 18/02/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANDUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDUGAL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VADAMADURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S AN.RAMANATHAN Advocate SR.No.10088
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.2957 of 2016 Date :18/02/2016 GJM/SKS/RR/SAR-I-23.02.2016-2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/