Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12882/2018disposed of

Prasanth Sankar, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2018-06-18Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.(MD) No.12882 of 2018 Prasanth Sankar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

...Respondents

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to grant permission and protection to conduct the 'Adalum Paadalum' dance programme on 19.06.2018 in pursuant to the "Sri Sellayee Amman Kovil" festival programme scheduled to be conducted at Veerapatti, Kulathur Taluk, Pulliyur, Pudukkottai District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.06.2018 and 13.06.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mathavan For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannidevan, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to grant permission and protection to conduct the 'Adalum Paadalum' dance programme on 19.06.2018 in pursuant to the "Sri Sellayee Amman Kovil" festival programme scheduled to be conducted at Veerapatti, Kulathur Taluk, Pulliyur, Pudukkottai District, by considering the petitioner's representations dated 04.06.2018 and 13.06.2018.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the representation of the petitioner dated 13.06.2018 is directed to be considered, within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents had objected the said representation of the petitioner and in the said temple, Kumbabishegam was performed on 17.06.2018 and therefore, the said application is not maintainable. 5.In the above circumstances, this Court is inclined to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.06.2018 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law on or before 19.06.2018. 6.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

+1CC to Mr.G.Mathavan Advocate in SR.No.68548. MYR DS/SKN-RSK/SAR- 2 :18.06.2018:2P/4C W.P.(MD) No.12882 of 2018 18.06.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/