Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4454/2019dismissed as infructuous

Nrk.Selvarathinam, v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-11-23Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4454 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4454 of 2019 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.2729 of 2019 NRK.Selvarathinam ... Petitioner/Sole Accuse Vs.

1. The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondent/Complainant

2. Maheswaran

...Respondent 2/Defacto Complainant

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records and quash the proceedings of the FIR in Crime No.777 of 2016 dated 08.11.2016 on the file of the first respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For R1 : Mr.R.Sivakumar Government Advocate(Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.G.Mariappan

O R D E R

This petition is filed to call for the records and quash the proceedings of the FIR in Crime No.777 of 2016 dated 08.11.2016 on the file of the first respondent.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit there was a dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent herein, with regard to the business transaction. So, on that basis, second respondent appeared before the first respondent and given a complaint, based upon which, enquiry was undertaken by the first respondent.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) would submit that based upon the compliant given by the second respondent, enquiry was undertaken and during the course of the enquiry, the matter has been settled between the parties and the second respondent has given a statement that no further action is required on his complaint. On that basis, it was closed and RCS notice was served to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4454 of 2019 4.Since the dispute between the parties was compromised and second respondent has given a statement that no further action is required, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this petition.

5.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tta Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

1. The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.G. PRABHU RAJADURAI, Advocate ( SR-35663[F] dated 24/11/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.G. MARIAPPAN, Advocate ( SR-35515[F] dated 23/11/2021 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4454 of 2019 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.2729 of 2019 23.11.2021 USK (17.12.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2