Mohideen Nagoor Meeran @ Mytheen v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.7961 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.7961 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.5391 of 2022 Mohideen Nagoor Meeran @ Mydeen

...Petitioner/Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State rep.by The Inspector of Police Aralvoimozhi Police Station Kanyakumari District Crime No.31 of 2020 ... Respondent/Complainant 2.M.Maheswararaj Sub Inspector of Police Aralvoimozhi Police Station Kanyakumari District ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.31 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same/A1 as illegal so far as the petitioner is concerned.

For Petitioner : K. Navaneetharaja For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi No.1 Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.31 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the facts of the case are exactly similar to the case covered in the decision reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in the case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.7961 of 2022

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the facts of the case are similar to the facts covered under the Judgment referred above. 4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

5. Perused the materials on record.

6.The facts of this case is similar to the facts covered by the Judgment of this Court reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019. Accordingly, the proceedings in Crime No.31 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police is hereby quashed insofar as the petitioner alone and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To

1. The Inspector of Police Aralvoimozhi Police Station Kanyakumari District

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD).No.7961 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.5391 of 2022 Date:28.04.2022 SA(11.05.2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2