Jothiraj v. The Inspector Of Police
CRL OP(MD). No.6329 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/06/2021 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL OP(MD) No.6329 of 2021
1. Jothiraj
2. Vekatramanan @ Venkatramanan
3. Kalishwari ...Petitioners/Accused No.1,3&4 Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, K.Pudupatti Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
(Crime No.37 of 2020). ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: Mr.B.N.Raja Mohamed, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Ravi, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.37 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest by the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420, 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, have filed this anticipatory bail petition. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the four named accused persons and ten others had approached the defacto complainant and received a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs only) on the promise of getting a Government Job and thereby cheated them. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the first petitioner is a painter by profession and he got in touch with two other persons named Anandan and Selvakumar, who informed the first petitioner that they can get Government Job.
Believing their words, the first petitioner introduced certain persons to them and he did not receive any payment and it was directly paid to the said persons. The learned counsel further submitted that without going against the main accused persons, the petitioners and his family members are being targeted by the respondent police. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.
CRL OP(MD). No.6329 of 2021 4.Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent police submitted that the second petitioner is the son-in-law of the first petitioner and the third petitioner is the daughter of the first petitioner. It was submitted that the accused persons had received a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs only) from the defacto complainant by promising to get Government Job. It was further brought to the notice of this Court that the anticipatory bail petition filed by the co-accused was dismissed by this Court by an order, dated 21.04.2021, in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3354 of 2021.
5.In the considered view of this Court, there are serious allegations made against the petitioners and it is a case of Job Racketing. The anticipatory bail petition filed by the co-accused has been dismissed by this Court and therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this anticipatory bail petition, since custodial interrogation will be required in this case. 6.In view of the above, this anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
sd/- 01/06/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUPATTI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6329 of 2021 Date :01/06/2021 TM SRS/VR/SAR-I/04.06.2021/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2