Solaisamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH Court ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.9974 of 2018 1 SOLAISAMY 2 KADIRPANDIAN 3 K.MANIKANDAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARUPPUKOTTAI TK POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.126 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.V.SASI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 & 506(ii) I.P.C., Crime No.126 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent. 3.This Court went through the contents of the F.I.R. It is seen that without any justifiable provocation, the petitioners have attacked the defacto complainant, who merely refused to sell the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ spare parts, unless the previous balance was settled.

4.Taking note of the unlawful conduct of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 20/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

MSA TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARUPPUKOTTAI TK POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9974 of 2018 Date :20/06/2018 PS/RR-CSL/GSR:26/06/2018:2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/