Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10065/2018disposed of

S.Kannan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2018-06-21Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR CRL.O.P.(MD)No.10065 of 2018 S.Kannan : Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3. Selvapoo : Respondents Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate protection to the petitioner and his property bearing Patta No.5584 comprised in Sur.No.249 situated at Uppoor Village, Thiruppalaikudi Post, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District from the hands of the 3rd respondent on the basis of the representation dated 19.05.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition is filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate protection to the petitioner and his property bearing Patta No.5584 comprised in Sur.No.249 situated at Uppoor Village, Thiruppalaikudi Post, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District from the hands of the 3rd respondent on the basis of the representation dated 19.05.2018.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents 1 and 2 against the proposed accused on 19.05.2018 alleging that the proposed accused demanded Rs.1,00,000/- as if she maintained the petitioner's property, when the petitioner left the native village. Hence, he seeks police https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

protection to his property and his life. But no action has been taken on the said representation. Hence, the present petition has been filed before this Court.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions, would submit that the enquiry is pending before the second respondent. He further submitted that if any specific time is granted, the second respondent will complete the enquiry on the petitioner's representation within the stipulated time.

5. In the light of the above, this second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.05.2018 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law after providing necessary opportunities to the parties concerned within the period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(W) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.C.Senthil Murugan, Advocate Sr.No.69196 PJL VB/SB/SAR4/06.07.2018/2P/5C CRL.O.P.(MD)No.10065 of 2018 21.06.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/