Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5876/2019dismissed as infructuous

Karthik @ Karthik Sakthivel v. The Inspector Of Police,

2021-11-22Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5876 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.11.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.OP.(MD)No.5876 of 2019 & Crl.MP(MD)No.3787 of 2019 Karthik @ Karthik Sakthivel ... Petitioner/3rd Accused Vs.

1.The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Taluk Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.129/2016) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Kasthuri ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant 3.Nagarajan ...3rd Respondent/Injured Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.129/2016 on the file of the first respondent Police and quash the same as against the petitioner. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Jeyakarthik For Respondents :

Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Counsel for Govt. of Tamil Nadu (Crl. Side) for R1 Mr.S.Suresh for R2 & R3

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking quashment of FIR in Crime No.129 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that joint compromise has been effected between the accused and the defacto complainant before the Trial Court and the petitioner has been acquitted in CC.No.251/2019 on 10.12.2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi.

3. Since joint compromise was effected between the parties and the petitioner has also been acquitted in Trial Court, nothing survives for further consideration in this case. Hence, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5876 of 2019 Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CRL) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mbi Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi.

2.The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Taluk Police Station, Ramanathapuram District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5876 of 2019 22.11.2021 SRK(CO) KB(08.12.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2