P.Gurusamy, v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.9952 of 2018 1 P.GURUSAMY 2 DR.R.RAVEENTHIRANAATH NEHRU ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1&2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUR POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM TALUK, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.NOT KNOWN/2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.R.KRISHNAN, Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 451, 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. Crime No.42 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent. 3.The petitioners are said to have threatened the defacto complainant. Taking note of the serious allegations made against the petitioners and the fact that the immovable property is sought to be grabbed unlawfully, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/- 20/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUR POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM TALUK, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.R.KRISHNAN, Advocate SR.No.10883

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9952 of 2018 Date :20/06/2018 PK/RR-CSL/RNB/25.06.2018 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/